Not Everyone has to Agree for a Ruling to be Valid - Abu Uwais Abdullah Ali

In the time of many fitan (trials and tribulations) we are living in, an individual or a group of people are refuted by a particular group of scholars and you hear the supporter of the refuted individual or party responding by saying: "Such-and-such, and such-and-such a scholar has not spoken with regards to this affair. Therefore, I choose to remain silent in this matter."

What Abu Uwais Abdullah Ali (rahimahulllah Ta'ala) will now explain, specifically with regard to the affair of Jarh wa Tadeel, it is not necessary that every scholar has to refute an individual for the refutation to be valid.  His statement is regarding the issue of Jihad and its affairs, but the principle can be applied to such matters using the same guidelines.

This benefit has been extracted from a lecture titled: JIHAD - The Misconceptions Cleared
Another benefit extracted from this lecture: Khomeini & Some of the Filth of the Shi'a

Abu Hurairah (رضي الله عنه) narrated that the Prophet ﷺ said: "Whoever invites to guidance will be rewarded like those who follow him in the guidance are rewarded, and that will not decrease the reward of those who have followed him." [Collected by Imām Muslim]

Conditions to re-use / re-post: No modification of any audio files. Any website that posts them must link back to sources mentioned above. Material not for sale.

Follow us: Telegram | Twitter | Website  | YouTube

Please leave a comment below describing the contents of this audio and how you benefitted from it.  These comments may be helpful to others.